<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content Sites Vs. Landing Pages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonathanvolk.com/internet-marketing/content-sites-vs-landing-pages.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonathanvolk.com/internet-marketing/content-sites-vs-landing-pages.html</link>
	<description>How to make money online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:21:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes (MasterlessSamur</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanvolk.com/internet-marketing/content-sites-vs-landing-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-3410</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes (MasterlessSamur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanvolk.com/internet-marketing/content-sites-vs-landing-pages.html#comment-3410</guid>
		<description>content pages in terms of natural search after finding a profitable niche can be good. turning your PPC landing page into a content site though will have pluses and minuses.  
 
in google&#039;s eyes, they&#039;ll like the added and original content and reward you for it with better QS&#039;s. but from a conversion standpoint, extra content (articles, links, etc) are not good as this gives the users too many choices, which will lower conversions.  
 
Therefore I will often &quot;hide&quot; content to get the best of both worlds. Not exactly white hat, but it works. This can be done easily with CSS and PHP.  
 
I recently wrote a tutorial on this here:   &lt;a href=&quot;http://masterlesssamurai.com/ppc/content-stuffing-your-landing-pages-for-a-little-extra-google-loving/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://masterlesssamurai.com/ppc/content-stuffing...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>content pages in terms of natural search after finding a profitable niche can be good. turning your PPC landing page into a content site though will have pluses and minuses. </p>
<p>in google&#039;s eyes, they&#039;ll like the added and original content and reward you for it with better QS&#039;s. but from a conversion standpoint, extra content (articles, links, etc) are not good as this gives the users too many choices, which will lower conversions. </p>
<p>Therefore I will often &quot;hide&quot; content to get the best of both worlds. Not exactly white hat, but it works. This can be done easily with CSS and PHP. </p>
<p>I recently wrote a tutorial on this here:<br />
  <a href="http://masterlesssamurai.com/ppc/content-stuffing-your-landing-pages-for-a-little-extra-google-loving/" rel="nofollow">http://masterlesssamurai.com/ppc/content-stuffing&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Three changes that will make you look like stupid marketer &#124; The Sleepy Surfer</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanvolk.com/internet-marketing/content-sites-vs-landing-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-1512</link>
		<dc:creator>Three changes that will make you look like stupid marketer &#124; The Sleepy Surfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanvolk.com/internet-marketing/content-sites-vs-landing-pages.html#comment-1512</guid>
		<description>[...]  Content Sites Vs. Landing Pages [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Content Sites Vs. Landing Pages [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Discount LCD TVs</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanvolk.com/internet-marketing/content-sites-vs-landing-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>Discount LCD TVs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanvolk.com/internet-marketing/content-sites-vs-landing-pages.html#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>@ mitub: Congratz and good luck. Surelly you will get good targeted traffic with your original content. Cheers </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ mitub: Congratz and good luck. Surelly you will get good targeted traffic with your original content. Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitub</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanvolk.com/internet-marketing/content-sites-vs-landing-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>mitub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanvolk.com/internet-marketing/content-sites-vs-landing-pages.html#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>hi jonathan, I just created my first affiliate site, I use amazon program. Usually I generate income from adsense, but I don&#039;t like the idea of getting income from 1 vendor only. 
 
I don&#039;t know where to start, so I just keep building on my blog content first. 
 
Any comment ? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi jonathan, I just created my first affiliate site, I use amazon program. Usually I generate income from adsense, but I don&#039;t like the idea of getting income from 1 vendor only.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t know where to start, so I just keep building on my blog content first.</p>
<p>Any comment ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ykw</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanvolk.com/internet-marketing/content-sites-vs-landing-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator>ykw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanvolk.com/internet-marketing/content-sites-vs-landing-pages.html#comment-1405</guid>
		<description>Why bother creating a content site? Is that for SEO, creating trust with visitors (quality info)... why not stick with landing pages that convert instead of risking them clicking on links to content and not finally clicking to the merchants site? thnks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why bother creating a content site? Is that for SEO, creating trust with visitors (quality info)&#8230; why not stick with landing pages that convert instead of risking them clicking on links to content and not finally clicking to the merchants site? thnks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Beaton</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanvolk.com/internet-marketing/content-sites-vs-landing-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Beaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanvolk.com/internet-marketing/content-sites-vs-landing-pages.html#comment-1396</guid>
		<description>Good idea. No point throwing yourself into a project which will not provide a return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea. No point throwing yourself into a project which will not provide a return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

